a remote sensing of burberry

Today, we will spotlight the Bohai Bay - the sea, the hundreds of square kilometers of oil pollution recently received the largest single area of ??oil co-perpetrator in order to take advantage of this sea of ??ConocoPhillips and is CNOOC. In fact, as well as burberry Watches , occurred just months before had begun, but people know it until today, "not responsible", "opaque" From the very beginning and now again arrogance, the experience can not group that shares interest in the system. We all are permanent in many cases, the balance of the ecosystem and damage the marine environment, knows the oil spill damage to expand the survival of mankind, to influence, to become a food chain as. However, compared to the serious consequences of the accident, because people did not expect the penalty for their business actually turned out to be light. This last July, held in Dalian on oil spills, or let my opinion, is not it an accident that the final examination of metaphor for the response capabilities of emergency risk marine environment in China, the inspection which has been the result, but the same result - does not go through. State Oceanic Administration, we are accidents, until 2000, that's burberry handbags dealing with the legal basis could be adopted "Law marine environmental protection in China." Has been provided 50 of the Act: "The oil exploration and marine oil development process, we must give a warning if violation of the provisions of the marine environment from pollution by the national maritime administration department, and take effective measures to prevent the spill from occurring, and will have to must be imposed to 20,000 yuan to 200,000 yuan not "-. It is a fine of 200,000 maximum penalty is the amount of it is! Just a joke! Long-term ecological value, whether it should be calculated, or have been destroyed? The law does not say! Anyway, no sea of ??people, at least the spirit of the issue of compensation does not exist. Companies due to less shock and awe, yet, if the current federal regulations, we are "criminals" or related parties held an average business, "Criminal Law" and I can not be based on? Infectious diseases including the "land of radioactive waste, water, air emissions, dumping or disposal, Contrast: Article 138, pursuant to the third the only existing" Criminal Law ", the" pollution of the marine crime "Since there is no waste, pathogens, hazardous waste or other hazardous materials are private property and public injury, serious consequences, or detention or criminal in prison for three years, leading to heavy losses impose a fine gold or , causing major environmental pollution accident, the result is especially... Second, the first emissions of chemical substances, deliberately old fan, a subjective impairment: severe, more than seven years in prison and In this provision, "" Criminal "is fine, I have three serious consequences including the risk of casualties due to toxicity and understand that there are at least three elements. First, I have a subjective intention: But how can you claim that responsibility? Second, are considered toxic and radioactive waste oil itself? No casualties and the third accident, what we have "serious consequences" to people, how will they control? ... In fact, pollution accidents last year in Dalian, which had such a problem, and nothing CNOOC eventually to drum for this recognition would not open the field, he "Measures are often said to be celebration and relief to be effective" - ??commonly called "wedding" to do the "back" funeral. Pollution accidents last year, Dalian, about the same time they are experiencing the US Gulf oil leak, Mexico, British Petroleum (BP) had lost almost went bankrupt in the accident, the party mainly responsible for dependent on the U.S. government filed a lawsuit directly to the. The accident, our oceans and Dalian Municipal Government, as well as to abandon the litigation, the story is also entitled to a trial of strength "in oil" argue that helped the famous state-owned enterprises. Well, I can understand it - between local and large state-owned enterprises, or who have it are conflicting interests? Then, even if you do not force the government, we appeal to the party that is responsible for the private sector take the lead in enforcing environmental protection can not be many? Even if you sue you, unfortunately, the civil power, according to the Supreme Court's judicial interpretations of the environmental groups, or qualifications, the main lawsuit is not a court, and placed on file must. In this way, the road has been closed all roads leading to large enterprises, high-handed, all demonstrate that the rights of the weak and. I "CNOOC" site, pay special attention to the last two days: "In addition to news, this event is due to oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico in Mexico are not equivalent to remind people to be free, full network performance that: as the "Oriental Morning Post," and song commentary said. If the public only haphazard accident. " The public interest, burberry clothing for frequent violations, you can not imagine the system is illegal, make a low-cost capital comes from the natural inclination. Km 32 million coastline under the jurisdiction of China, there is a million square kilometers, about 300 water square km 388 territory, we are all citizens of this critical resource for sustainable development, considered as landfill natural must. In addition to strengthening the law, we must ask: China has not established an early warning system for marine pollution? The United States and elsewhere, can learn how to establish a remote sensing satellite monitoring of marine pollution facilities? Rather than sending a lot of fishermen holding a spoon to scoop up oil but rather to send a technical team from the cleanup can I? ... Bohai Bay oil pollution incident, the following four or less, contaminated areas, nearly 20 times last year in Dalian since the accident, and an area of ??840 square kilometers of water! Hi handling of the accident, I said, if you still superficial, Hello everybody, I think, the greatest harm, not the sea, people

a remote sensing of burberry

Par cathy1988 le jeudi 14 juillet 2011

Commentaires

Il n'y a aucun commentaire sur cet article.

Recherche sur NoxBlog

Connexion à NoxBlog.com

Nom d'utilisateur
Mot de passe
Toujours connecté
 

Inscription sur NoxBlog


Adresse du blog
.noxblog.com

Mot de passe

Confirmation

Adresse email valide

Code de sécurité anti-spam

Code anti-bot

J'accepte les conditions d'utilisation de NoxBlog.com